Madelynn Fretto
Dr. Stephanie
Brown
ENGL 306
10 November 2016
Analysis of a Movement Artifact Draft
An artifact that summarizes the
events that occurred in the Birmingham Campaign is the photo shown above, which
was taken by white journalist Charles Moore and was first published in Life magazine (Moore). Moore was
considered the photographer of the Civil Rights Movement and his photos were
often published throughout the 1960s, since he protested Jim Crow
discrimination through photography (O’Neill). The image shows black high school
students being sprayed with a high-pressure fire hose during what was supposed
to be a nonviolent protest in Birmingham, AL. The tactics of nonviolent protest
that these students, and other protestors, used were lunch counter sit-ins,
boycotts of stores and merchants, and marches at City Hall (“The Birmingham
Campaign”). Unfortunately, the police department found any act of protest
against their authority as a threat and acted accordingly, as the photograph
clearly shows.
This powerful photo encapsulates numerous
aspects of this movement in one image that was distributed widely and seen
across America. The identities articulated through this photograph are the
African American people in the United States that were affected by segregation
laws. Project C, with the nonviolent sit-ins and boycotts, was this segregated
population’s way of protesting the way of life that was the norm. This protest
was one of many during the civil rights movement, but it was pivotal because of
the violent interactions that occurred between the black population and the
police. This photograph depicts the relationship between the black population
and the Birmingham Police Department, who counteracted the nonviolent protests
with tactics such as fire hoses and police dogs, attempting to silence the
voices that were trying so hard to be heard. This image is a powerful
representation of how high tensions were during this time and how much
opposition the Birmingham protestors faced, even from the police who were
supposed to protect the citizens of the city, as it was their duty. The
publishing of this photograph, among others, in Life magazine allowed people who were not near Birmingham to see
what was occurring.
This photograph is a form of protest
because the photographer wanted to document the inequality firsthand. This image
is especially powerful because the Birmingham Campaign was ultimately
successful, since it was a starting point for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and desegregation.
The protestors paid the ultimate sacrifice by physically putting themselves in
harm’s way using body rhetoric, which is intimidating since the law enforcement
officers were powerful figures. Though the protestors were often faced with
this type of opposition, the photography captured and published across the
country opened up a dialogue and showed the federal government, including
President John F. Kennedy, that action needed to be taken and segregation was
no longer to be ignored.
The moment in the movement that this
photograph is displaying occurred during early May 1963. At this time in the
movement, James Bevel, a member of the SCLC and an organizer of the movement, decided
to recruit a younger population to participate in the various demonstrations.
His reasoning for this decision “was that young people represented an untapped
source of freedom fighters without the prohibitive responsibilities of older
activists” ("Birmingham Campaign (1963)"). On May 2nd,
1963, over 1,000 black students planned a march, and many were arrested. The
following day, when more students attempted to march again, the police and fire
departments were told to stop the protestors with force. After this direction
from the public safety commissioner, Eugene “Bull” Connor, the following days
were filled with protestors being attacked with fire hoses and police dogs, as
well as beaten by the police officers. These occurrences were nationally
broadcasted via newspapers and television, and the image from Charles Brown was
one of these ("Birmingham Campaign (1963)"). An eyewitness account
describes how fire engines arrived at the scene, which was the 16th
St. Baptist Church, and set up their fire hoses. These fire hoses had “the
powerful water stripping bark off trees and tearing bricks from the walls as
the firemen knocked Negroes down” (Holt 796). These hoses were used to attack
anyone that was African American, regardless of whether or not they were
actually participating in the protest. The eyewitness also noted how the
violence that had occurred in these demonstrations, up until the point when
fire hoses were used, was from the police officers, not the demonstrators (Holt
799-800). This photograph showed the nonviolent protesting of young black high
school students being oppressed, yet again, but this time in a deplorable
manner.
This artifact displays the identities
articulated in this protest and how these protestors were challenged. Before
this movement, the black population in general, but especially in Birmingham, was
a voiceless group that did not have equal rights compared to their white
counterparts. The Birmingham Campaign brought these people to the forefront of
America’s minds, and this was enhanced by the media attention that came to the
protests. Media attention was high because of the dangerous situation that was
unraveling in Birmingham as women, men, and even children were challenged with
force (“The Birmingham Campaign”).
Visuals, especially photographs, are
a powerful tool to make a statement, and this picture evokes a variety of
emotions, since these students look helpless and in pain. The rhetorical
aspects of this photograph employ pathos and kairos. Pathos is the first aspect
that comes to mind when viewing this photograph. When this image was published,
it undoubtedly stirred up various emotions from those viewing it. One of the
emotions evoked is empathy, because most human beings have the capacity to
empathize with people in dire and painful situations, such as this one. Anyone
viewing this photograph can picture themselves being sprayed with a powerful
fire hose and the amount of anguish that would cause, which brings up emotions
of pity and great sadness that a human being would be subjected to this
inhumane treatment. Another emotion is anger towards the law enforcement that
is abusing their authority to prey on those who cannot defend themselves. The
organizers of this protest were Martin Luther King Jr., the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference (SCLC), and the Alabama Christian Movement for Human
Rights (ACMHR), and they wanted a direct action protest that was specifically
nonviolent. In fact, those who participated in the protest were taught the
philosophies of nonviolence, and how to have a nonviolent march ("Birmingham
Campaign (1963)"). With this notion of nonviolence in mind, the image
becomes even more powerful and invokes even more anger towards those who were
suppressing this movement. Kairos was employed by the effective timeliness of
the Birmingham Campaign in the context of the entire black civil rights
struggle. 1963 was a time when segregation was pervasive, especially in Birmingham.
Black people had been subjected to discrimination and segregation for years and
it was finally the time to put an end to all the hurt and discrimination. The
Birmingham Campaign had the right support from organizations and leaders,
including the SCLC and Martin Luther King Jr., that the movement was able to
take off. It ultimately caused great change, including legislative changes that
affected the nation with the passage of The Civil Rights Act of 1964. The
nation was ready for change and it was finally time for black people to have
the rights they had deserved for so many years.
Works Cited
"Birmingham
Campaign (1963)." Martin Luther
King Jr. And The Global Freedom Struggle.
Stanford University. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
Holt,
Len. "Eyewitness: The Police Terror at Birmingham." Story of the Week. Literary Classics
of the United States, Inc. Web. 26 Oct.
2016.
Moore,
Charles. Birmingham. Digital Image. The New York Times. The New York Times
Company, 15 March 2010. Web. 26 October
2016.
O’Neill,
Claire. “Charles Moore, Photographer Of The Civil Rights Movement, Dies At 79.”
NPR. 16 Mar. 2010. Web. 1 Sept. 2016.
“The
Birmingham Campaign.” PBS.org. Public
Broadcasting Service (PBS). Web. 1 Sept. 2016.
Questions from the writer:
1. Is my artifact strong and
complex enough to write an entire section of my paper on it?
2. Does my artifact involve
protest and is it concerned with a specific identity? Do I explain how it does
this?
3. Is the section clear and easy
to understand? Do I need to rearrange it at all?
Revision plan
ReplyDeleteHistorical and Rhetorical Context:
-Lessen the amount of historical context on slavery and add a little more about the historical context right before The Birmingham Campaign and the Civil Rights Movement. This will ensure that the protest/identity is very clear and not confusing to the reader.
-Make sure my historical context follows a timeline and does not jump around between time periods.
-Add some of the language used by leaders of the Birmingham Campaign, and how this contrasted with the government. Also integrate key vocabulary terms when necessary.
Object Analysis:
-Develop a smooth transition from the historical/rhetorical analysis section to the artifact section.
-Ensure all details are necessary, since this is a rather broad topic.
-In the third paragraph, do not jump to the conclusion that the image was powerful because the Birmingham Campaign was successful, but instead discuss how this made an impact.
-Remove the sentence, “This photograph is a form of protest because the photographer wanted to document the inequality firsthand" because this is a connection that may not be necessarily true.
Overview of introduction:
I want my paper to start by discussing the plight of the black population directly before The Birmingham Campaign, and how this contributed to the start of this movement. I could move some of the historical context regarding the environment of segregation in Birmingham and the nation in the 1960s to achieve this. I think the functions of Milan's intro that would be most useful to me are scene setting, purpose, audience, and argument outline, with the argument being that segregation needed to end.
Overview of conclusion:
I think the most important task for this conclusion would be explaining the aftermath and assessing/evaluating the effectiveness of the Birmingham Campaign. Since it was described as a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement, I think it would be best to analyze what aspects of the campaign made it a turning point, and how this affected the nation. One of the biggest impacts was that it directly led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, so this would be necessary to explore, as well as the aftermath in the city of Birmingham.