Showing posts with label MadelynnFretto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MadelynnFretto. Show all posts

Friday, December 9, 2016

An Open Letter

Madelynn Fretto
Dr. Stephanie Brown
ENGL 306
9 December 2016
Persuasive Essay: An Open Letter
Dear People Who Are Against Genetically Modified (GM) Food,
            I know what you are thinking. Why would I want to put a genetically modified food in my body? After all, that sounds dangerous and like your food is being manipulated in a laboratory with unsafe chemicals. However, GM foods are not nearly as bad as they sound, so let us start with some basic information. A genetically modified food is considered a GMO, which is a “genetically modified organism” and the term that is most prevalently used in the media. GMOs are made by altering the genes in an organism, which changes the DNA makeup. Genetic engineering, which is a relatively new field, involves taking genes from one organism and directly putting them into another organism (Goldbas, 2014). Nowadays, GMOs are prevalent in the food industry and “are considered major biotechnical advancements in agriculture” (Goldbas, 2014). These advancements, which produce food that ends up in our local grocery store, include plants that are resistant to pests, herbicides, and viruses and have greater crop yields. An important advancement is these plants can be modified to be healthier and more nutritional, including having more protein and vitamins (Goldbas, 2014). There are laboratories creating meat that is healthier by increasing the omega-3-fatty acid content, which decrease the risk of stroke and heart disease, among other diseases (Siegel & Verity). This is one example of many regarding the added nutritional benefits that can come from GM food. A practical use for GM foods is that they have been used in developing countries to combat lack of food and help the people receive quality nutrition to live a healthier life (Goldbas, 2014). If these GM foods have been used in developing countries because of their nutritional value, why would it be different for the people of America?
*Paragraph Structure: The purpose of the following paragraph is to address the health concerns people have about GM foods. The main characters are GMO crops and DNA and the paragraph uses chained topic strings.
In regard to our health and safety, “every major international science body in the world has reviewed multiple independent studies…in coming to the consensus conclusion that GMO crops are as safe or safer than conventional or organic foods” (Entine, 2013). GMO crops’ safety is supported by the American Medical Association and World Health Organization (Siegel & Verity). There are also concerns about ingesting DNA that is laboratory-made, because this seems like this novel DNA could change our genetic makeup and cause harm. However, DNA is part of the food we eat on a daily basis, whether it is genetically modified or not, and this DNA “is generally degraded by food processing, and…no evidence was found that DNA absorbed through the GI tract could be integrated into human cells” (Entine, 2013). There are specific processes in the body that ensure outside genes from food are not added to our genetic makeup.
GM foods are more common than you may think, and it is not just processed food that is genetically modified. Many foods found in the produce section are genetically modified that you may not be aware of. In the United States, a large amount of soy, corn, canola, papaya, and squash are genetically modified. These crops tend to be modified for resistance to herbicide, such as “U.S. sugar beet production [which] is estimated to be over 95% genetically modified for herbicide resistance” (“GMO Education”). Some of the other common reasons this produce is genetically modified is to make better quality food that will last longer, such as potatoes that do not bruise or apples that do not brown. There are other foods that have some genetically modified ingredients, including bread, cereal, veggie burgers, tofu, and baby formula (“GMO Education”). Less obviously, corn is often genetically engineered, which is used to make cornstarch used in sauces, soups, and corn syrup. Various oils that come from GMOs, such as canola, cottonseed, and soybean, are used to make cereal, bread, and salad dressing (Siegel & Verity). There are also indirect sources of genetic modification in eggs, meat, and other dairy products that were produced from animals given GM food (“GMO Education”). Research shows “there is no difference in the makeup of meat, milk, eggs, or other food that comes from animals who’ve been fed [GMOs]” (Siegel & Verity). Genetic modification is pervasive in a majority of the food we eat and have eaten for years, even the “healthy” food choices, such as veggie burgers, salad dressings, and protein powder (“GMO Education”).
*Paragraph Structure: The purpose of the following paragraph is to address the concern that pesticides are used excessively on GM crops. The main characters are misinformation, GM crops, pesticides, and crop yields and the paragraph uses chained topic strings.
I know there are numerous concerns that people like you have voiced about GM food, which is understandable based on the misinformation provided by the media. This misinformation has caused a concern that pesticides are excessively used on GM crops. GM crops are grown using pesticides, but pesticides are also used on almost any type of crop, whether it is genetically modified or not. Pesticides are somewhat of a necessity for farmers, and yes, even “organic” crops have pesticides used on them. Pesticides are a necessary evil for farmers because without them, insects and animals would ravage the crops and yields would decrease dramatically. Yields are increased with the innovation of genetic engineering, where “some GMOs are specifically designed to reduce pesticide use, such as the Rainbow Papaya which resists the ring-spot virus and saved Hawaii’s papaya industry” (Katiraee, 2016). Though pesticides are not the healthiest choice to be used on produce, they help farmers with their crop growth so they can provide this food to us at our local grocery store.
            Another common concern is the regulation, or seemingly lack thereof, of GMOs and whether they are considered safe when they are sold to consumers. Thankfully, GM crops are reviewed and tested before they are put on the market to ensure there are no new allergens that could potentially harm consumers (Entine, 2013). The FDA is involved in the GMO process more than people may know, and their role is to review all genetically modified foods. The FDA has a program called the Plant Biotechnology Consultation Program where “the FDA raises safety concerns during the engineering process and helps developers identify the kinds of testing they should do” (Siegel & Verity). The FDA compares GM food to the equivalent unaltered food to see if there is a difference in nutritional value and safety, and if the GM food is harmful, the food is not sold in any stores (Siegel & Verity). One point I agree with is that GM foods should have labels stating every ingredient to avoid allergic reactions. This is a prevalent topic in the food industry because as of now, there is a lack of laws requiring that GMOs be labeled, which is what causes much of the fear-based reactions against these foods (Goldbas, 2014). As a person who cares about your health and what you are eating, you need to consider scientific facts instead of basing your feelings and opinions on what the media and public tells you is true.
            The topic of GM foods has often been negative, since the media and public opinion is that they are to be feared. Ingesting DNA that has been manipulated in a laboratory seems like this would alter our genetic makeup and harm our body. However, people need to be more educated on GM foods, and the topic of GMOs as a whole, so they are not living in fear of foods that are found in almost every aisle of a grocery store. The prevalence of genetic modification in the food and agricultural industries is high and numerous studies and credible organizations have supported the notion that GM foods are safe to eat. An added benefit is these foods can be modified to have increased vitamins and minerals and can be healthy options for everyday meals. Science can bring clarity to issues that are obscured by unsupported statements, and GM foods are something to be welcomed into our daily lives.
Sincerely,
A Person Educated About GM Foods

*Word Count (essay only): 1,300
*I would want to publish this letter in a health magazine, such as Shape, Women’s Health, or Men’s Health to target a health conscious audience.
            The purpose of my conclusion was to offer a persuasive takeaway and sum up my argument. My persuasive takeaway and argument was that GM foods are scientifically shown to not harm our bodies, and I wanted the reader to leave thinking that they are not scary foods that should never be touched. GM foods can have health benefits and I wanted to educate my readers on a topic that is often talked about in the media. I chose this form of conclusion because I wanted a succinct closing that acknowledged their fear, but then counteracted it with my argument and persuaded them to reconsider their ideals.
Explication
            My open letter uses a few of the different writing skills and analytic techniques we have learned over the course of this class. My letter was mostly focused on using rhetoric that was persuasive to my audience. I mostly employed logos, starting off with an argument that was based on scientific evidence. The intent of my argument was to acknowledge that people are fearful of GMOs, but then show them through reason and logic that GMOs are not harmful and the stigma should be removed. Many people simply repeat what they hear on the media, but I wanted to urge my readers to use logic and research facts before making such an opinion. You could also say I used ethos, because I was trying to convince my reader of my credibility as the author. I did this by citing the sources of my various statements so they would see that my argument was based on fact and not just something I made up or assumed. I acknowledged the rhetorical situation of my protest by addressing the audience and discussing the purpose of the letter. I addressed the audience by greeting them directly at the start of my letter, and acknowledging their various concerns they may have about GM foods. The purpose of my letter was clear from the start, which was to persuade people to reconsider their opinion on GM foods and show them that they can be beneficial and healthy.
            I consider the mode of protest of my audience to be ineffective. People against GMOs have been seen carrying signs and offering their beliefs on how bad GMOs are for us. I consider this ineffective because their protests are based on feelings and fears, instead of facts. I think their protest would be much more effective if they acknowledged the scientific benefits of GMOs that have been studied, but then offered their counterargument also based on scientific facts.

Works Cited
Entine, Jon. "2000 Reasons Why GMOs Are Safe To Eat And Environmentally
Sustainable." Forbes. Forbes, 14 Oct. 2013. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.
"GMO Education." IRT: Institute for Responsible Technology. Institute for Responsible
Technology. Web. 8 Dec. 2016
Goldbas, Abbie. "GMOs: What Are They?" International Journal of Childbirth Education 29.3
(2014): 20-24. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.
Katiraee, Layla. "9 Misdirected Arguments against GMOs That Really Reflect Modern and
Organic Ag Issues." Genetic Literacy Project. The Genetic Literacy Project, 16 May 2016. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.
Siegel, Kate, and Suzanne Verity. "What You Need to Know About GMOs." WebMD. WebMD,

LLC. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.

Sunday, December 4, 2016

Final Draft: The Birmingham Campaign

Madelynn Fretto
Dr. Stephanie Brown
ENGL 306
4 December 2016
Research Paper Final Draft
The history of the black population in the United States is one of discrimination, segregation, and fear. In the years leading up to 1963, there had been a systematic oppression of this entire race of people that did not allow them to have equal rights in any aspect of their lives. Laws had been passed so that black people could not have access to resources and facilities available to white people. It was ingrained in white American’s minds that black people were considered to be less than them and should be treated accordingly. The compounding of these various factors is what led to the 1963 Birmingham Campaign in Birmingham, Alabama.
 In Birmingham, the climate leading up to the events in 1963 was tense and Birmingham was “probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States” (King 1). The purpose of the Birmingham Campaign was to focus on attainable desegregation goals that would be put into law by the city government. These goals included desegregation of shopping stores, fair employment standards, use of parks by black people, and a biracial committee to work on desegregating public schools. The Birmingham Campaign was one of numerous movements that occurred during the modern civil rights movement, in which the starting point is considered to be the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955 (Salem Press 131). However, even though it was one of many, it proved to be a turning point in the history of black Americans. This is because national attention was brought to Birmingham via the media and showed the country the negative effects of segregation. Additionally, the protest was successful in ending segregation in Birmingham and a direct consequence of the protest was the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Birmingham Campaign was a pivotal moment where black Americans finally had a voice and could make a positive change in their history, which until that point had been filled with inhumane treatment and a lack of equal rights. By using powerful rhetoric and effective protest tactics, Birmingham soon became a symbol of freedom and equality.
The history leading up to the Birmingham Campaign explains why the events occurred in Birmingham the way they did. There had been deliberate actions taken to degrade black Americans and hinder them from having social equality, all in the name of white supremacy. One of the most well known degradations of black people was their enslavement, and most of the black population in America was slaves from 1789-1865. A major legislative point for the enslaved population was the passage of The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850, which required the government to return slaves that had escaped to their owner, furthering the discrimination (Salem Press 276). In terms of education, black children, regardless of whether they were enslaved or not, were prohibited from being taught in Southern states (Salem Press 223). After 1865, black students were allowed to attend schools in the South, but were often taught by white teachers from the North that did not provide the same quality of education they would provide to white students (Salem Press 223). Discrimination continued even after slavery was abolished. However, the passages of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and 1867 attempted “to eliminate legal discrimination against newly freed slaves” (Salem Press 198). These measures were counteracted by the black codes that reverted back to the treatment the black population received when they were slaves by creating a poll tax, literacy tests, and intimidation to prevent black people from voting, even though it was their constitutional right to do so.
In 1876, during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War, federal troops left the South, but discrimination against blacks did not. This population suffered from deliberate violence against them racially and sexually, economic inequality, and lack of voting opportunity. Basically, the white population was doing everything in their power to make the black population “as lowly as the slaves their parents had been” (Ezra 59). Despite this low standard of living and rights, the Southern black population counteracted by creating schools and churches and they were becoming teachers, preachers, lawyers, and doctors. These educated people were working with the white population that was “fearful of the free black presence while at the same time seeking…full rights and privileges of citizenship” (Ezra 60). Unfortunately, there was a large percentage of the black population that remained in a low socioeconomic class because they were laborers, farmers, and domestic workers. This led to poverty for many black families because of these low-paying jobs and the lack of available opportunities for higher-paying jobs (Ezra 64).
 Southern white people created the Jim Crow laws in the 1880s and 1890s, which created “separate but equal” legal separation and a lack of access to various opportunities, which is termed “de facto segregation.” De facto segregation was the norm and caused the black population to be segregated in residential areas separate from the white population (Ezra 1-2). The Jim Crow laws meant that facilities and services were equally provided to both races, but separately, in theory (Salem Press 198). These laws caused segregation of various public places, including restaurants, workplaces, and public parks, among others. Specific cities and states passed their own versions of the laws. For example, in Mobile, Alabama, there was a curfew for black people enacted in 1909 (Salem Press 342). Lynching was also common during the late 19th century and early 20th century, which was considered Negrophobia and oftentimes, there would be no actual offense by the black person (Salem Press 540). In the early 1900s, black Americans also dealt with the Ku Klux Klan, among other racist groups, a lack of voting rights, and segregation in residential areas, educational facilities, employment, armed forces, and public areas (Ezra 64).
Prior to and during World War II, there were massive migrations of black people to cities in the West, North, and South (Hall 1239). In the North, black men usually were forced to work in factories and black women were usually hired in domestic jobs. Black migrants found themselves relegated to discrimination reminiscent of the slave-owning days and de facto segregation. The intent of these policies prevented black people from having good careers, educational opportunities, and decent residential options, creating large racial barriers (Hall 1240). Economic inequality was exasperated by the two-track welfare system, which helped families with one full-time worker and a wife who did not earn an income and stayed at home with the children. Many black families were ineligible because oftentimes, both the husband and wife had to work in order to have a chance at making enough money to keep their family economically afloat. In 1935, unemployment insurance was not provided to domestic and agricultural workers, which was how low-wage black families earned their income. Because of this, “55 percent of all African American workers and 87 percent of all wage-earning African American women were excluded from one of the chief benefits of the New Deal” (Hall 1241). This caused embarrassment for the black people that relied on other welfare options, which caused further stigmatization against them. In terms of housing, much of the white middle class moved into the suburbs, leaving behind a large black population in the cities. Highway building choices and zoning boards purposefully caused white people to be wary of black migrants, which decreased monetary investments in black neighborhoods. Banks would not grant mortgages to black people and businesses relocated to suburban areas. This move to suburbia caused segregation in city schools and black migrant students were placed in schools that did not have the prosperity supported by local taxes and equal educational opportunities (Hall 1241-1242).   
This history of black Americans leading up to the Birmingham Campaign shows why the climate was as tense as it was in 1963. The city was amiss with police brutality, legal discrimination against blacks, racist signs in the windows of stores, and there were bombings of the homes and churches that black people resided and worshipped (King 1). There were no black people in positions of power, including the police and fire department, and they could not hold jobs in retail, banks, stores, and public transportation. Black people were forced to work menial jobs in steel mills, households, or work in their segregated neighborhood and unemployment was a common tribulation they faced (Garrow 166). The campaign was protesting the centuries of discrimination they had been plagued with, as well as the strict segregation laws that affected every aspect of their lives in Birmingham. The specific moment in the process of the protest development that will be considered is the “period of inception,” which is when a sentiment of some sort becomes public when people become interested and involved (Griffin 11). For this specific movement, the nonviolent protests were planned in advance before the inception date, which was April 3rd, 1963. The tactics used were organized lunch counter sit-ins, marches, kneel-ins by black people at white churches, and boycotts. The campaign was purposefully nonviolent because it was known that these protests would be met with violence, putting media attention on Birmingham and allowing the nation to see what was happening to the black American population.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was one of the main leaders of the modern civil rights movement and a prominent activist in the Birmingham Campaign. He represented religious values and the collective action of the black population during the civil rights movement. He was the face of the millions of black Americans that did not have the means or opportunities to stand up for themselves. He was also well respected because he was a polished minister that was spiritual and mindful. Even though he was not the sole person who helped in the catalysis of this civil rights era, he is the one most people associated and still associate with that time period (Ezra 60). The efforts of many were most visibly in the various Southern civil rights organizations that were founded, including the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). The SCLC was the group that organized the Birmingham Campaign. These types of organizations, including the SCLC, drew upon American democratic principles and morality that stemmed from religion. They particularly represented “rural and urban blacks, high school and college students, and women” because these were the most marginalized populations (Ezra 60). The SCLC leaders were one of the reasons the Birmingham Campaign was as successful as it was, and the rhetoric of this movement and its leaders is what ultimately led to its success.
             The people involved in the Birmingham Campaign used rhetoric to make their voices heard, which until that point had been silenced. The Birmingham Campaign can be considered a social movement, which is an effort to create legal and social developments and changes, usually outside the realm of what is considered normal and common practice (Jasper 24). This movement is also “sustained,” meaning it is not one singular event, such as a one-day protest, but multiple events. Since the Birmingham Campaign lasted from April 3rd-May 10th, 1963, it was a sustained movement that progressed through organization and social networks (Jasper 24). In America, there was a development of social movements in the 1830s that brought personal choices to light and made them public protests and national issues. This included slavery, which was considered a sin, and reformers that based their protests on morality would protest against these people who were committing these evil sins (Jasper 45). The Birmingham Campaign is also a citizenship movement, which works “at gaining entry into the political system,” with the political system being basic rights and desegregation in the city (Jasper 118). The civil rights that the Birmingham Campaign was protesting had “to do with the state’s coercive interference in the lives of citizens,” since every facet of the black citizen’s lives were controlled by officials in charge (Jasper 119). 
The name of a phenomenon is important because it is the lens through which meaning and purpose is conveyed and is important in addressing an issue. Naming a protest group or movement as a whole is crucial because it highlights the purpose, identity, and morality and defines those who are actively participating in the protest (Jasper 77). The Birmingham Campaign was dubbed “Project C,” with the “C” standing for confrontation. This name came from Wyatt Tee Walker, who was a Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) founder and executive director. He also was actively involved in organizing the Birmingham protests and worked with Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also a founder of the SCLC and a minister. In order to maintain secrecy during the planning of these demonstrations, the planners communicated with code words in case their phone calls were being monitored (Garrow 175). Even though Project C stood for confrontation, Walker and Shuttlesworth’s plan was to have nonviolent action because they knew the protests would be counteracted with violence and media attention would be heightened. This attention would show the entire nation, who may not otherwise know what is occurring, the plight of the segregated black people in the South (Bass 96). The “Project C” name represents the nonviolent confrontation black people were employing to enact change, which showed their purpose, identity, and morality of treating everyone as equals, no matter their race.
Nonviolent resistance was the main tactic used in the movement, and the “nonviolent” word choice was a deliberate tactic used by the organizers to outline their rhetorical goals. “Nonviolence” showed outside observers, as well as the movement participants, that they were not there to cause any harm, but simply to let their voices and words make an impact and create change. Nonviolence, which was used throughout the civil rights movement, “is a central method for expressing political dissent…to bring about political change” and is protected by the First Amendment (Salem Press 465-466). The civil rights movement used nonviolence inspired by Mohandas Gandhi, specifically using boycotts, marches, and sit-ins to make a statement about desegregation. This was an effective legal tactic because the government was unsure about how to specifically prosecute these actions, and oftentimes those arrested would later be found innocent of crime (Salem Press 466). Nonviolence, typically used in democratic societies, centers on values of morality and the fact that it is unethical to hurt people, and believes change can only happen with love and peacefulness. This tactic will, in theory, cause elite people in charge to change legislation and policies, such as ending segregation and discrimination against black people (Salem Press 467).
            “Character work” is an important part of any protest “because characters tell us what emotions we are supposed to feel about them” (Jasper 92). Though a character seems like they would only be found in a fictional story, characters can be actual people and contribute more strongly to a protest’s purpose because observers are better able to empathize with an actual human that has feelings and problems. In terms of rhetoric, “characters suggest a role for the audience: stop being a victim, and start acting like a hero” (Jasper 92). In the Birmingham Campaign, there were four types of characters: the benevolent heroes and victims and the malevolent villains and outside agitators (Jasper 92). The heroes were the leaders of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), including Martin Luther King, Jr. and Fred Shuttlesworth, among others, who were directly involved in the planning and taking action with the various demonstrations. The victims, and identity articulated by the Birmingham Campaign, were the black people affected by segregation in their everyday lives, from where they lived to where they worshipped. The villains were the governmental leaders of Birmingham that created and upheld the segregation and discrimination laws. The villains and outside agitators included the Birmingham Police Department, which attacked the nonviolent demonstrators with fire hoses and police canines and caused national attention to be focused on the mistreatment of the black people of Birmingham.
            The Birmingham Campaign also influenced the rhetoric of the federal government and President Kennedy, because it shifted their focus towards the circumstances black Americans were facing and made it a national issue. During 1961, before the events in Birmingham in 1963, the focus of President Kennedy’s statements to the nation was foreign policy and the economy. In early 1962, the story was much the same, with only a small mention of civil rights in his State of the Union address. As civil rights movements began to gain momentum and the federal government was hearing their demands, President Kennedy began speaking more about actual ways in which to lessen discrimination, starting in late 1962. Some of the legislation he passed included equal housing opportunities for all races and focused on the voting literacy tests that were created as a disadvantage to black people. He also allowed the Committee on Equal Employment Opportunities to lessen discrimination in hiring practices and the workplace. He was working to end the “discrimination and segregation which deprive many Americans of equal opportunity in the exercise of their unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (Andrews and Gaby 514). These powerful words spoken by the President showed the nation that black Americans were being denied the same rights their white counterparts were given. He uses the phrase “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” which originated from the Declaration of Independence and is a powerful phrase that humanizes those who had been oppressed for so many years. Unfortunately, though these powerful words were spoken, there was still a lack of national legislation by 1963 (Andrews and Gaby 514). After the Birmingham Campaign, though, President Kennedy delivered an impassioned speech on June 11, 1963 where the rhetoric made clear he was intent on passing a civil rights bill, signaling “an important transition that launched efforts to pass a substantial civil rights bill” (Andrews and Gaby 515). This transition stemmed directly from the events that occurred in Birmingham and President Kennedy’s rhetoric clearly changed from 1961, where there were passive comments about civil rights, to post-Birmingham 1963. In this same June 11th speech, Kennedy discussed how what occurred in Birmingham and black equality struggles “have so increased the cries for equality that no city or state or legislative body can prudently choose to ignore them” (Andrews and Gaby 516). President Kennedy’s speeches were powerful tools that showed the influence Birmingham had on the movement, and his words brought these long-standing issues to government attention. Another powerful tool that was used in the Birmingham Campaign was visual rhetoric, specifically photographs, which showed the discrimination black people were facing even when attempting to make their voices heard.
 
            This photograph above summarizes the events that occurred in the Birmingham Campaign, which was taken by white journalist Charles Moore and was first published in Life magazine in May 1963 (Moore). Moore was considered the photographer of the Civil Rights Movement and his photos were often published throughout the 1960s, since he protested Jim Crow discrimination through photography (O’Neill). The image shows black high school students being sprayed with a high-pressure fire hose during what was supposed to be a nonviolent protest in Birmingham, AL. The tactics of nonviolent protest that these students, and other protestors, used were lunch counter sit-ins, boycotts of stores and merchants, and marches at City Hall (“The Birmingham Campaign”). Unfortunately, the police department found any act of protest against their authority as a threat and acted accordingly, as the photograph clearly shows.
This photograph encapsulates numerous aspects of the civil rights movement in one image that was distributed widely and seen across America. This is a powerful piece of visual rhetoric because Moore photographed young black students that were well dressed and were submitted to treatment that was unjust and humiliating. Viewing this photograph is disturbing because people can easily sympathize with these young adults because they are clearly in pain and one of the students is trying to protect the other with his body. The identities articulated through this photograph are the African American people in the United States that were affected by segregation laws, as well as the young black students that wanted to be a voice of change for their race. Project C, with the nonviolent sit-ins and boycotts, was this segregated population’s way of protesting the way of life that was the norm. This protest was one of many during the civil rights movement, but it was pivotal because of the violent interactions that occurred between the black population and the police. This photograph depicts the relationship between the black population and the Birmingham Police Department, who counteracted the nonviolent protests with tactics such as fire hoses and police dogs, attempting to silence the voices that were trying so hard to be heard. This image is a powerful representation of how high tensions were during this time and how much opposition the Birmingham protestors faced, even from the police who were supposed to protect the citizens of the city, as it was their duty. The publishing of this photograph, among others, in Life magazine allowed people who were not near Birmingham to see what was occurring. The protestors paid the ultimate sacrifice by physically putting themselves in harm’s way using body rhetoric, which is intimidating since the law enforcement officers were powerful figures. Though the protestors were often faced with this type of opposition, the photography captured and published across the country opened up a dialogue and showed the federal government, including President John F. Kennedy, that action needed to be taken and segregation was no longer to be ignored.
            The moment in the movement that this photograph is displaying occurred during early May 1963. At this time in the movement, James Bevel, a member of the SCLC and an organizer of the movement, decided to recruit a younger population to participate in the various demonstrations. His reasoning for this decision “was that young people represented an untapped source of freedom fighters without the prohibitive responsibilities of older activists” ("Birmingham Campaign (1963)"). On May 2nd, 1963, over 1,000 black students planned a march, and many were arrested. The following day, when more students attempted to march again, the police and fire departments were told to stop the protestors with force. After this direction from the public safety commissioner, Eugene “Bull” Connor, the following days were filled with protestors being attacked with fire hoses and police dogs, as well as beaten by the police officers. These occurrences were nationally broadcasted via newspapers and television, and the image from Charles Brown was one of these ("Birmingham Campaign (1963)"). An eyewitness account describes how fire engines arrived at the scene, which was the 16th St. Baptist Church, and set up their fire hoses. These fire hoses had “the powerful water stripping bark off trees and tearing bricks from the walls as the firemen knocked Negroes down” (Holt 796). These hoses were used to attack anyone that was African American, regardless of whether or not they were actually participating in the protest. The eyewitness also noted how the violence that had occurred in these demonstrations, up until the point when fire hoses were used, was from the police officers, not the demonstrators (Holt 799-800). This photograph showed the nonviolent protesting of young black high school students being oppressed, yet again, but this time in a deplorable manner.
This artifact displays the identities articulated in this protest and how these protestors were challenged. Before this movement, the black population in general, but especially in Birmingham, was a voiceless group that did not have equal rights compared to their white counterparts. The Birmingham Campaign brought these people to the forefront of America’s minds, and this was enhanced by the media attention that came to the protests. Media attention was high because of the dangerous situation that was unraveling in Birmingham as women, men, and even children were challenged with force (“The Birmingham Campaign”).  
            Visuals, especially photographs, are a powerful tool to make a statement, and this picture evokes a variety of emotions, since these students look helpless and in pain. The rhetorical aspects of this photograph employ pathos and kairos. Pathos is the first aspect that comes to mind when viewing this photograph. When this image was published, it undoubtedly stirred up various emotions from those viewing it. One of the emotions evoked is empathy, because most human beings have the capacity to empathize with people in dire and painful situations, such as this one. Anyone viewing this photograph can picture themselves being sprayed with a powerful fire hose and the amount of anguish that would cause, which brings up emotions of pity and great sadness that a human being would be subjected to this inhumane treatment. Another emotion is anger towards the law enforcement that is abusing their authority to prey on those who cannot defend themselves. The organizers of this protest were Martin Luther King Jr., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), and the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR), and they wanted a direct action protest that was specifically nonviolent. In fact, those who participated in the protest were taught the philosophies of nonviolence, and how to have a nonviolent march ("Birmingham Campaign (1963)"). With this notion of nonviolence in mind, the image becomes even more powerful and invokes even more anger towards those who were suppressing this movement. Kairos was employed by the effective timeliness of the Birmingham Campaign in the context of the entire black civil rights struggle. 1963 was a time when segregation was pervasive, especially in Birmingham. Black people had been subjected to discrimination and segregation for years and it was finally the time to put an end to all the hurt and discrimination. The Birmingham Campaign had the right support from organizations and leaders, including the SCLC and Martin Luther King Jr., which allowed the movement to take off. It ultimately caused great change, including legislative changes that affected the nation with the passage of The Civil Rights Act of 1964. The nation was ready for change and it was finally time for black people to have the rights they had deserved for so many years.
            The Birmingham Campaign was a challenging protest that still proved to be a successful historical movement. As stated before, the Birmingham Campaign was considered a turning point in the civil rights movement and was as successful as it was because of the tactics used and the articulation of a particular identity. The organizers purposefully taught the protestors nonviolent tactics because they knew they would be met with violence by the police department and media attention would be focused on Birmingham, making this a national issue. This would show the entire nation the mistreatment of black Americans by the government and government officials, which would hopefully inspire change at the national level. The identity that was articulated through this protest was black Americans that were affected by segregation and not given the same rights as their white counterparts. Though the protestors in Birmingham were a small handful of this entire population, they represented this larger group and strived to be the voices of change for the entire nation. The Birmingham Campaign proved to be effective in regard to national change, which was shown when President Kennedy began focusing his attention on black equality struggles. The passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was directly influenced by the events that occurred in Birmingham, which shows how effective the protest was at inspiring change. The Birmingham Campaign demonstrates that with effective leadership and organization, as well as a clear identity, change can occur even when it seems impossible. The Birmingham Campaign is an inspiring protest that will surely continue to influence history for years to come.

Works Cited
Andrews, Kenneth T., and Sarah Gaby. "Local Protest and Federal Policy: The Impact of
the Civil Rights Movement on the 1964 Civil Rights Act." Sociological Forum 30.S1 (2015): 509-27. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.
Bass, S. Jonathan. Blessed Are the Peacemakers: Martin Luther King, Jr., Eight White
Religious Leaders, and the ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’. LSU Press, 2001. Web.
"Birmingham Campaign (1963)." Martin Luther King Jr. And The Global Freedom Struggle.
Stanford University. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
Dagbovie, Pero Gaglo. What is African American History? Oxford: Wiley, 2015. Ebook
Library. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.
Ezra, Michael. Civil Rights Movement: People And Perspectives. Santa Barbara, Calif:
ABC-CLIO, 2009. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 26 Oct. 2016.
Garrow, David J. Birmingham, Alabama, 1956–1963: The Black Struggle for Civil
Rights. Vol. 8. Carlson, 1989. Web.
Griffin, Leland M. The Rhetoric of Historical Movements. 1952. Print.
Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd. "The Long Civil Rights Movement and the Political Uses of the
Past." The Journal of American History 91.4 (2005): 1233-1263. Oxford University Press. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.
Holt, Len. "Eyewitness: The Police Terror at Birmingham." Story of the Week. Literary Classics
of the United States, Inc. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.
Jasper, James M. Protest: A Cultural Introduction to Social Movements. Chicester:
Wiley, 2014. Ebook Library. Web. 26 Oct. 2016. 
King, Martin Luther, Jr. "Letter from Birmingham Jail." The Atlantic Monthly 212.2
(1963): 78-88. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.
Moore, Charles. Birmingham. Digital Image. The New York Times. The New York Times
Company, 15 March 2010. Web. 26 October 2016.
O’Neill, Claire. “Charles Moore, Photographer Of The Civil Rights Movement, Dies At 79.”
NPR. 16 Mar. 2010. Web. 1 Sept. 2016.
Salem Press. The Civil Rights Movement. Pasadena, Calif: Salem Press, 2000. eBook
Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 26 Oct. 2016.

 “The Birmingham Campaign.” PBS.org. Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Web. 1 Sept. 2016.