http://sain.scaa.sk.ca/items/index.php/eskimo-woman-with-dog-inside-igloo;rad
This website meets the criteria because it is relevant to the topic of igloos and is reliable because it is published by the University of Saskatchewan. The image included a reference code and is published by a credible source.
Website that does not meet criteria:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igloo
Wikipedia does not meet these three criteria because it is open to public editing and is not relevant because not all sources are credible even though sources are given. It is not current; not all the content within the website is based on scholarly consensus. It is not like a group of credible sources or writers or professors got together and approved every Wikipedia post.
Reliable??: not really! For a long time we’ve known Wikipedia can't always be trusted. A lot of opinions are expressed through the site so it can't be seen as reliable.
No comments:
Post a Comment