Definition:
The limits of compatibility describe
the range of tolerable discrepancies within an organization that results in no
change in its structure.
Example:
The marriage inequality protest
(support for gay marriage) is an example of a movement that does not function
within the limits of compatibility; the result is a change that redefines the
jurisdiction of the state government. Traditionally, the state government could
decide on the legality of same-sex marriage in its own state, however, after
the nation-wide legalization of gay marriage, individual states no longer can
make that decision.
From the Text:
The definition of limits of
compatibility according to Melucci is “the range of variations a system can
tolerate without modifying its structure” (334).
In suggesting ways to analyze
protests, he states that some “collective phenomena” transgress limits of
compatibility; this transgression involves a radical change characterized by
the “redefinition of the
[existing] boundaries of the organization itself” (334). He distinguishes this
from “forms of adaptation of order”, where changes are still within the limits
of “compatibility (334).
Works Cited:
Melucci,
Alberto. “Getting Involved: Identity and Mobilization in Social Movements.” International
Social Movement Research, vol. 1,1988, p. 334.
No comments:
Post a Comment