John Chestnut
Dr. Brown
English 305
September 29, 2016
TUSD
School Walkout
What
is an effective protest? Is it violence? Is it making as much noise as possible
until you get noticed? Can something as simple as walking out of school be an
effective form of protest? The answer depends on who does it and also when. In
January of 2012, the Tucson Unified School District decided to completely cut
out ethnic and Mexican American studies. This cut came to a district where 60%
of all students were Mexican American. (Biggers) The students were left with
only one thing to do and that was protest.
The
students would end up staging two different protest. Both would be peaceful.
The first coming in April of 2011 when a group of nine students would take over
a school board meeting by staging a sit in. Each student had a chain and would
chain themselves to a chair to show how they felt emotionally about the cutting
of the ethnic studies. (Herreras) The news would only one show one student
being loud and banging on the desk next to the chair he was sitting in. This
protest gave the issue its first nation exposure and showed that the students
were not fighting for a class but for their culture and what they believed in.
The second protest
would come in January of 2012 when the students of the TUSD districts decided
to walkout of schools during class time. (Biggers) An unprecedented move that
would lead to some students getting suspended, but also send a message that
their voices will not be silenced. The students walked as one big group, some
with their families, all the way down to the TUSD downtown offices. The reason
was still about their Mexican American studies with the only reason being given
was that money would be withheld from the district if the classes were not cut.
The students used ethos throughout both of the protest, but even more so in the walkout. By appealing to the ethics of the situation, the district could not avoid any student who had taken part in the walkout or sit in. It’s still befuddling to think that the district could cut away the classes and the only reason given was because John Huppenthal, the superintended of public instruction at the time, threatened to withhold millions of dollars from the TUSD district if they did not comply and eliminate the classes. (Biggers) The students appealed the wrong doing and brought light to, what some would call, an extremist measure.
The students used ethos throughout both of the protest, but even more so in the walkout. By appealing to the ethics of the situation, the district could not avoid any student who had taken part in the walkout or sit in. It’s still befuddling to think that the district could cut away the classes and the only reason given was because John Huppenthal, the superintended of public instruction at the time, threatened to withhold millions of dollars from the TUSD district if they did not comply and eliminate the classes. (Biggers) The students appealed the wrong doing and brought light to, what some would call, an extremist measure.
The students also
called upon one another and played off of each other’s emotions during the
walkout. They walked together as one group with one common goal, herein lying
the pathos of the situation. The walkout had made the nation become more aware
of the unjust structure of the new cuts in the academic system. Stars such as
Eva Longoria chimed in on the situation calling the ban on classes more tragic
than SB1070. (Planas) Movie stars and the general populace began to take note
and shed light upon the situation as the movement gained traction.
Logic infers
students and academic scholars in general be subject to equivalent measures of
study. In suppressing fields of study and growth, that underlying sense of
logic is defied. Furthermore, combined efforts in large groups under shared
mentalities have historically proven to be effective and powerful means of
communication and declaration. These ongoing issues and counterproductive
decisions are especially detrimental when considering the ethnicity of most
students attending in the district. (Biggers) These puzzling and repressive actions
beg simple reason of both the students and anyone working toward exposing the
matter, a clear example of logos’ important place in the movement and its wake.
The protest movement
lives on in the decision that was made in a 2015 supreme court case that
brought ethnic studies back into schools. (Diaz) It showed that maybe the cut
of Mexican American studies was a racially fueled one and also a wrong one. The
coverage that the walkout gained from not only local, but also national news
outlets showed that this was a very effective and successful protest. And while
the debate may differ slightly in terms of context, look to today’s political
conflict as highly illustrative evidence toward the stance of racism and ethnic
inequality being alive and well in this country. Without affirming a political
stance of my own, it’s not difficult to recognize the outcry of citizens and leaders
given certain candidate’s views. And it is movements like here in Tucson that
help to strengthen backlash and a rejection of bias and inequality.
It
is my personal belief that studying other cultures as well as your own is
always a positive experience and one that anyone no matter what race or what
ethnicity you are can always benefit from. I knew people who participated in
the walkout and each person was doing it not just for them but also for their
own future generations. It is something that could be somewhat related to Brown
vs The Board of Education. A case that featured its own walkouts for racial
segregation in schools. If the cutting of Mexican American studies had stayed,
then who knows what could have followed in its wake. This protest and the
ruling pass down in 2015 bringing the classes back showed that sometime out constitution
needs a bit of reboot that makes us remember those older cases. This whole
ideal has shown us that not only is a peaceful protest effective, it can cause
a positive change for our culture. The TUSD school walkouts show that people
will not stand for any unjustness, especially if it pertains to the study and
further development of one’s background no matter what race they are.
Work Cited
Skylar, Blake.
Tucson bans Mexican-American studies, students walk out. 26 Jan. 2012. Web. 1
Oct. 2016.
Huicochea, Alexis.
Students in walkout suspended. Arizona Daily Star, 2 July 2014. Web. 1 Oct.
2016.
Biggers, Jeff.
“Tucson School Walk Outs Grow: Protest School District’s Folly and Mexican
American Studies Banishment.” Huffington Post. The Huffington Post, 23 Jan.
2012. Web. 1 Oct. 2016.
Diaz, Tony.
“Arizona Gets Schooled: Update on Ban of Mexican American Studies #MayaVsAZ.”
Huffington Post. The Huffington Post, 11 Aug. 2015. Web. 1 Oct. 2016.
Herreras, Mari. A
broken community. Tucson Weekly, 18 July 2013. Web. 1 Oct. 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment