Esther Bae
Rhetoric of
Protest Object Paper
In a rhetorical
situation, the circle of author, message/purpose, context, and audience is the
ultimate backbone in creating an effective mode of persuasion. The rhetor’s
purpose and the elements of persuasion – logos, ethos, pathos – sketch the
identities relevant to the object of protest. In this photograph, victims of
child labor – a practice prevalent in many underprivileged countries - are seen
partaking in a protest in New Delhi, India for the passage of the Child and
Adolescent Labor (Protection and Regulation) Bill (Malhotra). Child laborers
across India gathered for the passage of this bill which contained regulations
such as: prohibiting adolescents (14-18) from working in hazardous conditions,
preventing children under the age of 14 to be employed, and placing stricter
enforcement on employers including penalization for the first offense (PRS). Arms
raised, fists clenched, mouths open, the loud shouts of the young are echoed in
the image.
Human
trafficking is alive in underdeveloped areas and is not considered taboo
because of its wide-spread, accepted practice. While restrictions seem to
somewhat interrupt its expansion, child labor is still an ongoing phenomenon
especially true in families anxious to make ends meet. Thus, the children of
the family are often separated from their parents and siblings, give up the
possibility of an education, and work in desolate conditions with meager pay
hungry for the idea of reuniting with their family once again.
The
photographer, Altaf Qadri, is an award-winning photojournalist and promoter of educating
the world on current events, specifically with a focus on capturing stories in
underdeveloped and war-torn countries such as Cambodia, Nepal, Afghanistan, and
India. Qadri, the creator of this object of protest aims to gather response
from its audience – most likely readers who keep up current events, especially
that of humanitarian matters, and advocates of journalism and the mediums in
which stories are shared, particularly of Associated Press (Qadri’s agency).
Presumably referring to the audience as people already knowledgeable on current
events, Qadri’s purpose is to foster and educate on the topic of child labor in
a hypermediated and emotional sense. The photograph reveals protesting of a large,
unified mass of child laborers fighting against child labor and directing
change (identities framed by the photograph) largely through pathos and ethos. This
photograph is a large representation of the dynamics of inequality present in
underprivileged communities; the photo exposes not only child labor, but the existence
of overriding authority swerving out of lax regulation, politicized practices,
broken families, and lost youth.
Pathos, the appeal to emotion and chief
rhetorical strategy, is stained on the faces of the young victims of human
trafficking – bold, eager, frustrated, and manipulated children with arms
raised, fists clenched, and mouths open in protest all wear white hats to
symbolize the unification of their identity in solidarity. Key emotions can be
identified on the faces of these children: anger, (perhaps, indignation would
better characterize), courage, and grief of their own liberty and happiness. The
exasperations of exploited children can be vicariously felt by the audience:
the viewers empathize with those subjugated under abusive authority. This
photograph reveals the identities of child labor and unification for
humanitarian change, specifically, the frustrations of the children across the
globe subjected to unfair human trafficking protesting for liberal change in
regulation of human trafficking.
Although
ethos is not as transparent in the strategic rhetoric as pathos, there are
subtle but critical dynamics in which the element is showcased in the rhetor’s
argument. Qadri, himself, was in self-exile (a form of private protest) and at
one point, held up in Libya during the Libyan Revolution (Altaf Qadri). Through
this, raw connections between Qadri – an observer of the protest scene – and
the captured identity in his photograph can be used to our understanding and
acceptance of the rhetor – establishing credibility of the photographer and his
mannerisms in displaying the inequity of child labor. Perhaps, the photograph
is a reflection of his own identity when he, once too, protested against
socio-political injustice – self-exile being the outcome (Altaf Qadri). Moreover,
ethos is embedded in the photographer’s object; the children (the entire
make-up of the photo) are children laborers; they individually are identifiers
of the identity. Thus, Qadri’s use of capturing firsthand, is arguably a
legitimate rhetorical strategy. Instead of logical reasoning to support the
identity in this piece of protest rhetoric, emotional appeal provides a more
effective and natural means of rhetor-audience interconnection.
Judging
from a historical perspective, the object of protest was successful in its purpose
seeing how the Child and Adolescent Labor (Protection and Regulation) Bill has
been passed and cemented into law in 2016 (Columbia). Rhetorically speaking,
the photograph was strong in its performance: candid in nature with focus on the
raw snapshot of young victims rebelling against child labor and demonstration
for change. Generally, the public
empathizes with the youth, especially, the very youth of youth – those who
should be playing soccer in the neighborhood after the end of the school day
rather than exchanging their safety and well-being for meager pay, long hours,
and hazardous conditions. Therefore, the image of young protesters, victims of
human trafficking, pulls at the heartstrings of the concerned public – a
testimony to the effective use of pathos. Qadri’s framing of the photograph’s
confines including the zoomed-in and clear image of a few children –
particularly, of a little girl proudly protesting in the middle of the square –
provides a statement to his rhetoric. Individually, the young girl is distinct
from the others in the crowd – she has an identity to herself: Name, girl,
daughter, perhaps sister or brother, native of her town, should-be student
instead of laborer; but together, these children progressively protest in
solidarity by sharing a collective identity – witness to Qadri’s individual style
of capturing the perfect snapshot of protest movement largely through
intentional appeal to emotion.
Works Cited
"Altaf Qadri." World Press
Photo. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.
Colombia, By. "Child Labour
(Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016 Passed in Parliament - Times
of India." The Times of India. N.p., 2016. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.
Malhotra
Aditi Malhotra The Wall Street Journal Biography Aditi Malhotra @A4iti Aditi91 Google Malhotra, Aditi. "Youngsters
Protest Child Labor in New Delhi." WSJ. Wsj.com, 30 Aug. 2013.
Web. 01 Sept. 2016.
PRS, By PRS TeamArticles Citing.
"The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2012."
PRS. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Sept. 2016.
I feel as through introducing what rhetorical analysis is, along with the key terms of rhetorical analysis followed by the introduction to your topic are slightly confusing. However, it is important to frame the entirety of the paper as an analysis of the rhetoric of the image of child labor. If the introductory paragraph could be rewritten in such a way to do both of these things simultaneously I feel as though it would be more successful in framing the paper as a whole. In the following few paragraphs, the image’s argument are made very clear but your own personal argument about whether Qadri was successful isn’t very evident throughout the paper. I feel like separating the paper into three parts would be most successful: firstly discussing the image itself and it’s rhetorical context, then discussing the argument it presents along with how it is presented. Lastly, concluding with whether or not you found Qadri to be successful would perfectly conclude the entire paper. You do say that the image was ‘strong in it’s performance’ but I feel as though and entire section dedicated to why it was ‘strong in it’s performance’ would add some bulk to your paper along with explanation. Overall, this paper is very strong. Context is given thoroughly, the argument is laid out very clearly, I just think some tweeking to the organization would really strengthen the paper, and add a bit of cleverness to it as well. This is some awesome work!
ReplyDeleteAs for the audience I believe Esther got it right. The image and idea behind it is most likely people always up on the current news but also possibly people who can do something about this. People who have the money or influence to make changes in these countries are who Altaf Qadri is trying to reach. I like how you started quite close in with these few children in the picture and then bring it out and expand it as a larger issue. I would have like to see more on the people on the other side of the argument. Are there specifics on certain businesses or certain people to keep in mind? I would like to know a bit more on the other side, their argument, something to show how hard this fight really was. Overall I am persuaded by this paper. I believe in the equality for the young. They should have freedom to do what they want and not lose their life in these places. You maybe could have brought in logos with the idea that a large part of the world has already made the change so should their country come to the times. As for the organization of your paper I find the beginning unnecessary. I do not think we needed that information about what rhetoric is about. It does not add to the paper. A revision here would be to get rid of the section and create a more interesting or powerful introduction. I know she said not to worry about citation but I just wanted to say I cannot follow yours. In the middle of your third paragraph I believe you repeated yourself with “people already on current events.” And in the end I have to talk about the end of your paper. I felt like I was in the middle of a story and then wham it is over. I don’t think you have a a strong ending bringing things all together in a nice bow. Overall just little things here and there and when corrected a much stronger paper you will have.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteA strength of your paper is your use of evidence. The evidence used throughout helped to successfully get your message across. I had a difficult time figuring out what your thoughts of who the audience of the picture was. If you were to state who would have seen the picture, and why those seeing the picture would allow for it to be successful, it would greatly strengthen your paper as a whole. Something else that would help the flow of your paper is better transitions from one paragraph to the next, whether this be through statements at the end of the paragraphs before or through adjustments in your topic sentences. For example, paragraph 4 launches directly into this idea of pathos as a rhetorical strategy after just addressing the photographer. A sentence that would bridge this gap would allow for the thought process of the reader going through your essay to be easier overall.
ReplyDeleteYour organization is also a strength, and the thought process that it encourages causes your thesis to be clear and understandable. I would like for the identity that you have identified to be more explicitly stated. Referring to it in paragraph four is useful to emphasize your point, but by having a paragraph explaining how that is the identity of this object would help to focus your essay and strengthen your thesis.
Revision Plan:
ReplyDelete• Work on into paragraph: (omit the literary definition of a rhetorical situation) and include the definition of human trafficking before expanding on it in the second paragraph
• Work on smooth transitions (effective “train of thought” process)
-pathos logos/ethos
-concluding sentences in paragraphs make sure that it is conclusive to the idea of paragraph and appropriate
• Work on ending paragraph, specifically, more on how successful the photographer was