Wednesday, September 14, 2016

The World vs. The West Boro Baptist Chruch


Hope Galmarini
Eng. 306
15 September 2016
Rhetorical Analysis Assignment- Draft
The World vs. The West Boro Baptist Chruch
            Extremism is seen throughout the religious realm, and does not discriminate. Therefore, extremism can be seen throughout the Church of Islam, Judaism, Catholicism, and Christianity. The West Boro Baptist Church is a Baptist congregation that many would argue are the epitome of extremism. They are famous for creating a public spectacle of themselves, by protesting gay pride events, the funerals of fallen military members, movies, Comi Con, and an assortment of other public events throughout the nation. These protests have garnered the attention of the nation by the use of their imagery, language, and sheer anger. The church is small, being only members of the Phelps family, and share their ideals to the world through their website called ‘godhatesfags.com’. () On this website, they also share statistics such as ‘how many people have been damned since you’ve been on this site’ and ‘how many people God has killed in the Middle East’. Sensationalism is the key to success for this particular group, particularly the incitement of anger from their audience.
            The anger incited by the West Boro Baptist Church has also been met with comedy. For instance, in 2011 at the Sundance Film Festival semi famous director Kevin Smith attacked the group head on when they attempted to protest his movie Red State. Coincidentally the inspiration for the film was actually the West Boro Baptist Church. Smith was prompted that the group would be protesting the first showing of the film. He decided that he had to do something, had to counter the protests in one way or another. Kevin Smith chose comedy.
            After reading about the group, and seeing a multitude of media coverage on their pickets, Smith decided that he found their sensationalistic behavior to be ‘ridiculous’ and out right silly. So, his friends and colleagues took it upon themselves to make their own counter protest signs. Along with their own picket signs, Smith prompted all attendees of the showing to bring their own signs. Whoever came with the best, most ridiculous, and maybe offensive, sign would win a free ticket to the screening. Some of the signs created by Smith and his friends read things like: “God hates press screenings”, “God hates Mondays”, “Shirley you can’t be serious”. All of these picket signs directly mocked signs previously used by the group. The winner of the free screening ticket created a sign simply with the image of an Ewok, covered in a ‘Ghosbusters-esque’ ‘no’ symbol, as Kevin Smith described in his filmed Q & A session “An Evening With Kevin Smith.” Weeks after the initial protest, Kevin invited the Phelps family to further screenings… In which they attended. Smith has described their relationship as comical and it almost can be said to be a sort of friendship (Smith, Kevin).
            Kevin Smith came to the conclusion that ‘people like them’ are in search for sensationalism, and attention. Through this counter protest of sorts, Smith attacked their want for attention and sensationalism by simply making them a big joke. Humor was the key strategy in this debacle, and in further protests against Kevin Smith he has reverted back to this. It may be for his own fun, or to make a statement about the West Boro Baptist Church. Nevertheless, it has changed the worldly perspective of the church. Now, many news outlets do not even discuss the group, because that fuels the fire. Outrage on social media is at an all time low: the group, in short, is loosing steam. That is, they are loosing an audience. The audience for the group seems not to be those that particularly agree with their preachings, but those who are outraged by the language used and the messages shared by the Church. Those who are religious are outraged by the incorrect teachings of the Church, those who are not believers are outraged that a group speaks in such a hateful way, The West Boro Baptist Church has a goal of attracting outrage. Therefore, the intended audience is those who are outraged and are willing to feed into their outrage instead of attempting to deflect it.
            The West Boro Baptist, on their website, gives no clear indication of their church’s purpose. Other than to ‘spread the word of God’ it is unclear why ‘spreading the word of God’ means picketing funerals, parades, and movies. The assumed purpose would be that these protests incite anger, disgust, and overall attract attention. In turn, the church get’s media coverage, and presumable that’s the avenue in which they have decided to spread the word of God. However, there is no clear indication from any of the Phelps family why this is the rhetorical strategy they have decided upon. The question is always deflected by more rhetoric of the church, more slogans, more “God hates fags” type of language.
            If the group’s intended goal is to incite outrage, they have been successful in doing so over the last decade. However, if their intended purpose was to gain followers, it is not clear if they have been successful. The rhetoric used by the group is usually categorized as ‘hate speech’. The group is mainly successful by their use of pathos, by inciting rage in the audience. Authority is a key rhetorical strategy as well, but it is not the authority of the Phelp’s family or the audience, it is the authority of God and the Bible. The group utilizes their own translations of the holy text to create their rhetoric, and when it is argued by the audience the main response is ‘it’s the word of God’. The group uses the ultimate authority, and does this in such a way that it is almost indisputable. That’s why Smith’s counter protest was so successful in deflecting the hate group, because the rhetoric used by Smith and his friends had very little to do with religion or even in response to the actual rhetoric of the West Boro Baptist Church. He simply mocked them, and utilized the rhetorical strategy of inciting laughter to deflect the group.
            Overall, the West Boro Baptist Church may be successful in their own purpose of attracting attention. However, Kevin Smith’s counter protest deflected the attention they so wanted, and therefore at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival, Smith was successful. Through his use of pathos, and sheer comedy, his message of positivity was communicated successfully and clearly. Both identities, both sides of this ‘argument’, utilize pathos as a primary rhetorical strategy, but it seems that the Church’s claims to the greatest authority have failed them and humor and positivity prevailed.




Works Cited
“Cult Kids: Westboro | Vice | United States” VICE. Web. 14 Sept. 2016

Smith, Kevin. "Kevin Smith: Burn in Hell." Youtube. N.p., 21 Sept. 2015. Web. 1 Sept. 2016.
“Westboro Baptist Homepage” Westboro Baptist Home Page. Web. 14 Sept. 2016

4 comments:

  1. To start this off I want to start with the title you chose for this paper. I want to say that even though we weren’t suppose to mention grammar I think if it the title of your paper it should be spelled right. (Unless I read it wrong) “The World vs. The West Boro Baptist Chruch,” doesn’t seem like the right title for what I read. You talk about the things the church does and how it offends people, but in the paper it seems it is more about Kevin Smith against the church and not the world, even though I am sure the world hates them. As for the audience, you mention the world again but for this protest it was more of a small comedic rally type of protest. One more bit of information I would like is maybe the leader of the church. It would give the church a more powerful standing instead of just some church. I believe you used pathos correctly with Kevin Smith using humor and the church using key words such as “God hates fags” or speak how fallen soldiers are evil thus reaching their goal. I think you keep beating me over the head with how the church members are extremists. You have many quotes but there doesn’t seem to be anything backing up what you are saying, kind of no sources to add. There is only Kevin Smith and the church, no other people or groups of any type are mentioned. For revisions you can maybe bring in more backing. You can maybe go further into the Kevin Smith part since that seems to be the main part of your paper. After reading this, I have heard of this group, I am slightly interested into looking further into this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hope:
    I liked how you introduced the word, “extremism” and how it was applied to Westboro Baptist. The examples of their acts were effective; however, the sudden transition to the statistics on their website could be saved for the logos analysis. Also, I believe that the last sentence could be a statement that could better frame the overall argument of the first paragraph and perhaps be a segue to the explication. Again, for the following paragraphs, I believe that the topic and ending sentences need to be complementary to one another – almost, in the sense of looping the focus of the paragraph in its entirety. The paragraph that begins with “After reading about the group…” seems to be the context relevant for understanding the protest scene. The beginning of the next paragraph would better fit as context previously given above. Overall, the organization seems a bit loose. I think in order to analyze the author’s purpose and the respective rhetorical strategies, a paragraph explicitly dedicated to this with a topic sentence regarding the purpose and strategies would be effective. I enjoyed the strong diction throughout the paper – it wouldn’t be a paper on Westboro Baptist if it didn’t have strong words! I was not sure where you had stated the identity and rhetorical strategies. I understand that pathos is the main rhetorical strategy; however, I do not see how the author used that in regards to the rhetoric of protest scene at the movie screening in your analysis. Furthermore, I was a bit confused on the identity – you talk about Westboro Baptist in general and then the protest at the film festival, so I cannot draw the picture frame that you are interested in communicating to us. Overall, nice job and it a pleasure reading your paper; it was a pretty amusing topic that is not very common in modern-day society’s protests!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your essay was a little confusing for me at the beginning. From the title and the introduction paragraph, I knew that you were addressing the protests of the West Boro Baptist Church, though you also spent a significant amount of time on Kevin Smith’s response, and in some ways protest, to the church. Though I think that the example that you provide of Kevin Smith’s response and using their protests against them is a useful piece of evidence, I think that you dwell too long on it throughout your essay. This confusion caused me to miss what identity you were focusing on in general. For a revision, perhaps you could condense the Smith example while adding in others. If your main focus is the WBB Church, emphasize what the identity they are associating with is. I think that your interpretation of whether or not the church has been successful or not is very well done, but maybe you could move these ideas to the conclusion. After focusing a whole essay on their methods of protest and their identity, a nice final statement would be about whether or not their methods actually work, or have worked in the past. It would add to your conclusion, and strengthen it overall.
    You have the group’s purpose located in one of the last paragraphs in your essay. It would be stronger to have this statement earlier on, which would also help to emphasize the identity. My recommendation is for it be in the second paragraph or the third if you use the second for a bit of background information.
    Overall, I would work towards finding more evidence to prove your points on the purpose of the group and their identity. You have a good start, and by minimizing the Kevin Smith example and focusing more on the church you can make your essay a lot stronger.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Revision plan:

    -Centralize the argument to just how the WBBC is successful in their own pursuits.
    -Define the goal of the WBBC: In their view they are spreading the word 'of God', along with gaining attention, are only truly successful in gaining attention.
    -Discuss how 'the world' has reacted to the WBBC, use Smith as an example of this along with San Diego Comi Con and other sources, along with simply sheer media coverage.
    -Discuss more in detail Ethos, pathos and logos. Mainly ethos and pathos since there really isn't much logos involved.
    -members of the church?
    -reorganize paper to satisfy all aforementioned changes.

    ReplyDelete